Category: News

Cannabidiol, commonly known as CBD, has become a ubiquitous topic of conversation. Its presence is felt everywhere, from local and national news to endorsements by professional athletes. In the United States alone, one in seven individuals uses CBD for various reasons, and it’s likely been a topic of discussion among your own circle of friends and family. However, despite its widespread discussion, the facts surrounding CBD can be quite intricate.

The burgeoning dialogue around CBD is undoubtedly positive. As new evidence emerges, the interest from the scientific and medical communities continues to grow, with numerous clinical studies currently underway. Yet, amidst this growing curiosity and acceptance, there remains a significant level of confusion about CBD’s facts, origins, legal status, uses, properties, and applications.

To navigate this complex landscape, here are some recent news articles about CBD:

Posted on by

NCAA Votes to Remove Cannabis from Banned Substances List

The NCAA’s Landmark Decision: Removing Cannabis from its List of Prohibited Substances for Division I Players The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has long been the governing body of college sports in the United States, overseeing the athletic programs of many colleges and universities. Over the years, the NCAA has implemented various policies aimed at maintaining the integrity of sports and ensuring the well-being of student-athletes. One such policy has been the prohibition of certain substances, including cannabis. However, a recent and historic decision by the NCAA to remove cannabis from its list of prohibited substances for Division I players, effective immediately, marks a significant shift in the landscape of collegiate athletics and substance regulation. This blog delves into the details of this decision, exploring its implications for athletes, the rationale behind the change, and the broader societal context that has influenced this move. A Historic Decision: The NCAA’s Cannabis Policy Change The NCAA’s decision to remove cannabis from its list of prohibited substances for Division I athletes is monumental, not just for the organization but for the broader sports community. For decades, cannabis has been classified as a banned substance under NCAA regulations, with student-athletes facing suspensions and other penalties if they tested positive. This policy was in line with federal laws and societal views that classified cannabis alongside more harmful and addictive substances. However, recent years have seen a significant shift in public opinion and legal frameworks regarding cannabis. The NCAA’s decision reflects this change, acknowledging that cannabis is no longer viewed in the same light as it was decades ago. This decision does not only impact the athletes directly but also sends a message about the evolving understanding of cannabis and its role in society. The Rationale Behind the Decision The decision to remove cannabis from the NCAA’s list of prohibited substances did not come overnight. It was the result of extensive research, debate, and reflection within the organization. Several key factors contributed to this historic change: Evolving Public Opinion and Legalization Trends: Over the past decade, there has been a significant shift in public opinion regarding cannabis. What was once seen as a dangerous drug is now legal for medicinal use in most states and for recreational use in an increasing number of states. This shift in public perception has been driven by a growing body of research highlighting the potential medicinal benefits of cannabis, as well as its relatively low risk compared to other substances like alcohol and tobacco. The NCAA recognized that continuing to ban a substance that is legal in many states where its member schools are located would be increasingly difficult to justify. This discrepancy between state laws and NCAA regulations created confusion and inconsistency in enforcement, leading to calls for reform. Medical Research and Understanding of Cannabis: Scientific research has shown that cannabis can have a range of therapeutic benefits, particularly in managing pain, anxiety, and other conditions that are common among athletes. Unlike opioids and other pain management drugs, cannabis has a lower risk of addiction and overdose. The NCAA’s decision reflects a growing recognition of the importance of evidence-based policy. By aligning their regulations with the latest scientific understanding, the NCAA is prioritizing the health and well-being of its athletes. Advocacy from Athletes and Stakeholders: Many athletes and advocates have long argued that the NCAA’s cannabis ban was outdated and overly punitive. They pointed out that cannabis is less harmful than other substances that were not banned by the NCAA, such as alcohol and prescription painkillers. Over the years, several high-profile athletes have been penalized for cannabis use, leading to widespread criticism of the policy. Advocacy from these athletes, along with support from medical professionals and other stakeholders, played a crucial role in pushing the NCAA to reconsider its stance. Implications for Division I Athletes The removal of cannabis from the NCAA’s list of prohibited substances has far-reaching implications for Division I athletes. This decision will affect various aspects of their lives, from their athletic careers to their personal health and well-being. Mental and Physical Health: One of the most significant benefits of this policy change is the potential positive impact on athletes' mental and physical health. Many athletes use cannabis for pain management, recovery, and anxiety reduction. With the removal of the ban, athletes can now use cannabis without fear of penalty, allowing them to explore alternative methods of managing their health. This change is particularly important for athletes who suffer from chronic pain or injuries. Instead of relying on prescription painkillers, which can be addictive and have harmful side effects, athletes can now use cannabis as a safer alternative. Career and Reputation: The NCAA’s previous cannabis ban often led to harsh penalties for athletes who tested positive, including suspensions and damage to their reputations. These penalties could have long-lasting effects, potentially jeopardizing professional careers and future opportunities. With the removal of the ban, athletes no longer face the risk of career-altering penalties for cannabis use. This change allows athletes to focus on their performance and development without the added stress of potential sanctions. Leveling the Playing Field: The NCAA’s decision also helps level the playing field for athletes from states where cannabis is legal. Previously, athletes from these states faced a dilemma: adhere to state laws and use cannabis legally, or comply with NCAA rules and risk penalties. This inconsistency created an unfair advantage for athletes from states where cannabis was illegal. By removing the cannabis ban, the NCAA ensures that all athletes are subject to the same rules, regardless of their state of residence. The Broader Societal Context The NCAA’s decision to remove cannabis from its list of prohibited substances cannot be viewed in isolation. It is part of a broader societal shift in the perception and legalization of cannabis. Understanding this context is crucial to fully grasp the significance of this decision. Cannabis Legalization Across the U.S.: As of 2024, cannabis is legal for recreational use in 23 states and for medicinal use in 38 states. This widespread legalization has fundamentally changed how cannabis is viewed and used in society. The NCAA’s decision reflects the reality that cannabis is no longer a fringe issue but a mainstream topic with significant public support. By aligning its policies with state laws, the NCAA is recognizing the new legal and cultural landscape surrounding cannabis. Shift in Drug Policy and Criminal Justice Reform: The removal of cannabis from the NCAA’s prohibited substances list is also in line with broader trends in drug policy reform. Across the country, there is a growing movement to decriminalize or legalize cannabis and to address the disproportionate impact of drug laws on marginalized communities. The NCAA’s decision can be seen as part of this larger effort to rethink outdated drug policies and to adopt a more compassionate and evidence-based approach to substance regulation. Impact on Other Sports Organizations: The NCAA’s decision is likely to have ripple effects across the sports world. Other sports organizations, including professional leagues, may feel pressure to reevaluate their own cannabis policies in light of this change. This decision sets a precedent that could influence how cannabis is regulated in sports at all levels, from youth leagues to professional organizations. The Path Forward: What’s Next for the NCAA and Collegiate Athletics? The decision to remove cannabis from the NCAA’s list of prohibited substances is just the beginning of what is likely to be an ongoing conversation about substance use and athlete well-being. As the NCAA moves forward, several key areas will need to be addressed: Education and Awareness: With the removal of the cannabis ban, it will be crucial for the NCAA to provide education and resources to athletes about responsible cannabis use. This includes information on the potential risks and benefits of cannabis, as well as guidance on how to use it safely and legally. The NCAA can partner with medical professionals, mental health experts, and substance use specialists to develop comprehensive educational programs for athletes, coaches, and administrators. Monitoring and Evaluation: The NCAA will need to monitor the impact of this policy change on athletes and the broader sports community. This includes tracking health outcomes, performance, and any potential issues related to cannabis use. By regularly evaluating the effects of this decision, the NCAA can make informed adjustments to its policies and ensure that the well-being of athletes remains a top priority. Policy Alignment Across Divisions: Currently, the removal of cannabis from the prohibited substances list applies only to Division I athletes. The NCAA will need to consider whether this policy should be extended to Division II and III athletes as well. Aligning policies across divisions could help create a more consistent and fair regulatory framework for all NCAA athletes. Addressing Stigma: Despite the growing acceptance of cannabis, there is still stigma associated with its use, particularly in the sports community. The NCAA will need to work to reduce this stigma and create an environment where athletes feel comfortable discussing and using cannabis without fear of judgment or discrimination. This can be achieved through public statements, educational campaigns, and by fostering open dialogue within the collegiate sports community. Conclusion: A New Era for Collegiate Athletics The NCAA’s decision to remove cannabis from its list of prohibited substances marks the beginning of a new era in collegiate athletics. This historic move reflects the changing legal and cultural landscape surrounding cannabis and demonstrates the NCAA’s commitment to evolving with the times. For Division I athletes, this decision offers new opportunities for managing their health and well-being while leveling the playing field and reducing the risk of career-altering penalties. For the broader sports community, the NCAA’s decision sets a precedent that could lead to further changes in how cannabis is regulated and perceived in sports. As the NCAA and its member institutions move forward, the focus will be on ensuring that this policy change is implemented in a way that prioritizes the health and safety of athletes. By providing education, monitoring outcomes, and addressing stigma, the NCAA can help create a more supportive

The NCAA’s Landmark Decision: Removing Cannabis from its List of Prohibited Substances for Division I Players

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has long been the governing body of college sports in the United States, overseeing the athletic programs of many colleges and universities. Over the years, the NCAA has implemented various policies aimed at maintaining the integrity of sports and ensuring the well-being of student-athletes. One such policy has been the prohibition of certain substances, including cannabis. However, a recent and historic decision by the NCAA to remove cannabis from its list of prohibited substances for Division I players, effective immediately, marks a significant shift in the landscape of collegiate athletics and substance regulation.

This blog delves into the details of this decision, exploring its implications for athletes, the rationale behind the change, and the broader societal context that has influenced this move.

A Historic Decision: The NCAA’s Cannabis Policy Change

The NCAA’s decision to remove cannabis from its list of prohibited substances for Division I athletes is monumental, not just for the organization but for the broader sports community. For decades, cannabis has been classified as a banned substance under NCAA regulations, with student-athletes facing suspensions and other penalties if they tested positive. This policy was in line with federal laws and societal views that classified cannabis alongside more harmful and addictive substances.

However, recent years have seen a significant shift in public opinion and legal frameworks regarding cannabis. The NCAA’s decision reflects this change, acknowledging that cannabis is no longer viewed in the same light as it was decades ago. This decision does not only impact the athletes directly but also sends a message about the evolving understanding of cannabis and its role in society.

The Rationale Behind the Decision

The decision to remove cannabis from the NCAA’s list of prohibited substances did not come overnight. It was the result of extensive research, debate, and reflection within the organization. Several key factors contributed to this historic change:

  1. Evolving Public Opinion and Legalization Trends:
    • Over the past decade, there has been a significant shift in public opinion regarding cannabis. What was once seen as a dangerous drug is now legal for medicinal use in most states and for recreational use in an increasing number of states. This shift in public perception has been driven by a growing body of research highlighting the potential medicinal benefits of cannabis, as well as its relatively low risk compared to other substances like alcohol and tobacco.
    • The NCAA recognized that continuing to ban a substance that is legal in many states where its member schools are located would be increasingly difficult to justify. This discrepancy between state laws and NCAA regulations created confusion and inconsistency in enforcement, leading to calls for reform.
  2. Medical Research and Understanding of Cannabis:
    • Scientific research has shown that cannabis can have a range of therapeutic benefits, particularly in managing pain, anxiety, and other conditions that are common among athletes. Unlike opioids and other pain management drugs, cannabis has a lower risk of addiction and overdose.
    • The NCAA’s decision reflects a growing recognition of the importance of evidence-based policy. By aligning their regulations with the latest scientific understanding, the NCAA is prioritizing the health and well-being of its athletes.
  3. Advocacy from Athletes and Stakeholders:
    • Many athletes and advocates have long argued that the NCAA’s cannabis ban was outdated and overly punitive. They pointed out that cannabis is less harmful than other substances that were not banned by the NCAA, such as alcohol and prescription painkillers.
    • Over the years, several high-profile athletes have been penalized for cannabis use, leading to widespread criticism of the policy. Advocacy from these athletes, along with support from medical professionals and other stakeholders, played a crucial role in pushing the NCAA to reconsider its stance.

Implications for Division I Athletes

NCAA and Division 1 cannabis ban lifted

The removal of cannabis from the NCAA’s list of prohibited substances has far-reaching implications for Division I athletes. This decision will affect various aspects of their lives, from their athletic careers to their personal health and well-being.

  1. Mental and Physical Health:
    • One of the most significant benefits of this policy change is the potential positive impact on athletes’ mental and physical health. Many athletes use cannabis for pain management, recovery, and anxiety reduction. With the removal of the ban, athletes can now use cannabis without fear of penalty, allowing them to explore alternative methods of managing their health.
    • This change is particularly important for athletes who suffer from chronic pain or injuries. Instead of relying on prescription painkillers, which can be addictive and have harmful side effects, athletes can now use cannabis as a safer alternative.
  2. Career and Reputation:
    • The NCAA’s previous cannabis ban often led to harsh penalties for athletes who tested positive, including suspensions and damage to their reputations. These penalties could have long-lasting effects, potentially jeopardizing professional careers and future opportunities.
    • With the removal of the ban, athletes no longer face the risk of career-altering penalties for cannabis use. This change allows athletes to focus on their performance and development without the added stress of potential sanctions.
  3. Leveling the Playing Field:
    • The NCAA’s decision also helps level the playing field for athletes from states where cannabis is legal. Previously, athletes from these states faced a dilemma: adhere to state laws and use cannabis legally, or comply with NCAA rules and risk penalties. This inconsistency created an unfair advantage for athletes from states where cannabis was illegal.
    • By removing the cannabis ban, the NCAA ensures that all athletes are subject to the same rules, regardless of their state of residence.

The Broader Societal Context

The NCAA’s decision to remove cannabis from its list of prohibited substances cannot be viewed in isolation. It is part of a broader societal shift in the perception and legalization of cannabis. Understanding this context is crucial to fully grasp the significance of this decision.

  1. Cannabis Legalization Across the U.S.:
    • As of 2024, cannabis is legal for recreational use in 23 states and for medicinal use in 38 states. This widespread legalization has fundamentally changed how cannabis is viewed and used in society.
    • The NCAA’s decision reflects the reality that cannabis is no longer a fringe issue but a mainstream topic with significant public support. By aligning its policies with state laws, the NCAA is recognizing the new legal and cultural landscape surrounding cannabis.
  2. Shift in Drug Policy and Criminal Justice Reform:
    • The removal of cannabis from the NCAA’s prohibited substances list is also in line with broader trends in drug policy reform. Across the country, there is a growing movement to decriminalize or legalize cannabis and to address the disproportionate impact of drug laws on marginalized communities.
    • The NCAA’s decision can be seen as part of this larger effort to rethink outdated drug policies and to adopt a more compassionate and evidence-based approach to substance regulation.
  3. Impact on Other Sports Organizations:
    • The NCAA’s decision is likely to have ripple effects across the sports world. Other sports organizations, including professional leagues, may feel pressure to reevaluate their own cannabis policies in light of this change.
    • This decision sets a precedent that could influence how cannabis is regulated in sports at all levels, from youth leagues to professional organizations.

The Path Forward: What’s Next for the NCAA and Collegiate Athletics?

The decision to remove cannabis from the NCAA’s list of prohibited substances is just the beginning of what is likely to be an ongoing conversation about substance use and athlete well-being. As the NCAA moves forward, several key areas will need to be addressed:

  1. Education and Awareness:
    • With the removal of the cannabis ban, it will be crucial for the NCAA to provide education and resources to athletes about responsible cannabis use. This includes information on the potential risks and benefits of cannabis, as well as guidance on how to use it safely and legally.
    • The NCAA can partner with medical professionals, mental health experts, and substance use specialists to develop comprehensive educational programs for athletes, coaches, and administrators.
  2. Monitoring and Evaluation:
    • The NCAA will need to monitor the impact of this policy change on athletes and the broader sports community. This includes tracking health outcomes, performance, and any potential issues related to cannabis use.
    • By regularly evaluating the effects of this decision, the NCAA can make informed adjustments to its policies and ensure that the well-being of athletes remains a top priority.
  3. Policy Alignment Across Divisions:
    • Currently, the removal of cannabis from the prohibited substances list applies only to Division I athletes. The NCAA will need to consider whether this policy should be extended to Division II and III athletes as well.
    • Aligning policies across divisions could help create a more consistent and fair regulatory framework for all NCAA athletes.
  4. Addressing Stigma:
    • Despite the growing acceptance of cannabis, there is still stigma associated with its use, particularly in the sports community. The NCAA will need to work to reduce this stigma and create an environment where athletes feel comfortable discussing and using cannabis without fear of judgment or discrimination.
    • This can be achieved through public statements, educational campaigns, and by fostering open dialogue within the collegiate sports community.

Conclusion: A New Era for Collegiate Athletics

The NCAA’s decision to remove cannabis from its list of prohibited substances marks the beginning of a new era in collegiate athletics. This historic move reflects the changing legal and cultural landscape surrounding cannabis and demonstrates the NCAA’s commitment to evolving with the times.

For Division I athletes, this decision offers new opportunities for managing their health and well-being while leveling the playing field and reducing the risk of career-altering penalties. For the broader sports community, the NCAA’s decision sets a precedent that could lead to further changes in how cannabis is regulated and perceived in sports.

As the NCAA and its member institutions move forward, the focus will be on ensuring that this policy change is implemented in a way that prioritizes the health and safety of athletes. By providing education, monitoring outcomes, and addressing stigma, the NCAA can help create a more supportive

Posted on by

SAFER Banking Act, HHS Rescheduling May Change Landscape for Marijuana

SAFE Banking Act and the marijuana industry

I. Introduction To The Latest Developments

Healthcare along with Finance world is a buzz with the latest developments regarding the Health and Human Services (HHS) rescheduling marijuana and the Safe and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act. Great changes can be fully conducive to transformation of the marijuana profile in the United States.


II. HHS Rescheduling



Definition and Background

HHS rescheduling denotes the possible revision of federal drug regulation with respect to marijuana which would in affect help the CBD industry. Making it much easier to get financing for CBD pain creams and oils. Such a change may acknowledge that the plant has some medical benefits and reduce the legal barriers to its use.


Possible Impact on Marijuana Industry

This could alter the industry by loosening controls on research, production, and distribution.


Public and Medical Community Reactions

The public and the medical community also have a split opinion whereby some see change due to the therapeutic advantages, while others worry that it may be abused.


III. SAFER Banking Act



Overview and Goals

SAFER Banking Act has been introduced to enable legal marijuana businesses to use banking, a facility that they have missed for some time.


How It Could Change Marijuana Business for Financial Transactions.

This move could legalize and simplify the handling of any financial dealings for the marijuana enterprises, which could act as the ground for the prosperity and stability.


IV. Overall Implication for Marijuana Landscape



Legal Implications

These legislative changes all together have the potential to offer better alignment between federal law and the state laws in areas where marijuana is legal.


Economic Effects

It is also probably that they will increase investment in the industry and development, thus, stimulating the industry’s economic growth.


V. State vs Federal Laws

State and Federal laws on marijuana



Current State-Level Marijuana Laws

This has brought about patchwork regulation on legalization of marijuana in many states.


Potential Federal Law Changes

A concerted federal effort could synthesize the current array of legalities and facilitate adherence for both business and consumer.


VI. Public Opinion and Social Impact



Shifts in Public Perception

Today, the public opinion regarding marijuana has changed significantly such that more support for legalization is evident.


Social Implications

This is part of a sweeping change in attitude towards the drug due to revealing personal stories of when weed use has actually helped people.


VII. Medical Marijuana

Medical Marijuana



The research and access environment for medical marijuana has changed greatly over the past year. It will open new frontiers for medical research and, of course, improve patient access to cannabis. Just as the medical field is expanding its horizons, the betting industry is also widening its reach, with a comprehensive list of offshore betting sites offering diverse opportunities for international betting enthusiasts seeking new experiences beyond their national borders.


Patient Perspectives

Patients hope for improved treatment options that will be more available and effective.

VIII. Business Opportunities



Ground Floor: Emerging Business Opportunities in the Marijuana Industry.

For new business ventures and innovations, this is a changing landscape.


Risks and Challenges

Yet, entrepreneurs need to struggle with dynamic regulations and market ambiguities.


IX. Regulatory Challenges



Navigating the Complex Regulatory Environment

In the light of the above, companies should follow state and federal laws.


Future Regulatory Outlook

The regulatory environment is anticipated to change in the future, which would call for flexibility and insight.


X. International Perspective



Global Marijuana Policy Trends

There has also been change of attitudes towards marijuana internationally, with some countries towards decriminalization or even legalization.


Conclusion

the Journey Toward Marijuana Legalization: HHS Potentially Reschedules, “SAFER Banking Act”. These dual impacts could have lasting influence in the industry, affecting the field of medical research to common business practices.




Posted on by

What’s The Difference? Cannabis Decriminalization vs. Legalization

Introduction

In this article, we aim to provide a thorough analysis of the distinctions between cannabis decriminalization and legalization. Our objective is to offer a comprehensive understanding of these terms, highlighting their implications and potential impacts. By delving into the details of each approach, we aim to provide valuable insights that will assist readers in grasping the complexities of this subject matter.

hemp plant for cbd

Understanding Cannabis Decriminalization

Definition and Scope

Cannabis decriminalization involves reducing or eliminating criminal penalties associated with the possession of small amounts of cannabis. Although the specific parameters vary across jurisdictions, decriminalization typically replaces criminal sanctions with civil penalties, such as fines or mandatory drug education programs. It is crucial to note that decriminalization does not equate to full legalization or the establishment of regulated cannabis markets.

Potential Impacts

Decriminalization primarily aims to address concerns related to the disproportionate targeting of marginalized communities by law enforcement, overcrowding in prisons, and the adverse consequences of criminal records for non-violent cannabis offenders. By reducing criminal penalties, decriminalization shifts the focus towards harm reduction and public health. Furthermore, it can serve as a stepping stone towards broader reforms in cannabis policies.

Analyzing Cannabis Legalization

Definition and Framework

Cannabis legalization entails the complete removal of legal restrictions on the production, sale, possession, and use of cannabis. Legalization can take various forms, such as medical or recreational legalization, each with distinct regulations and requirements. This comprehensive approach facilitates the establishment of a regulated cannabis market, generating tax revenue and fostering business opportunities.

Social and Economic Implications

Certainly! Here’s an updated version of your text with the mention of a casino:

“The legalization of cannabis carries significant social and economic implications. By eliminating the illicit market, legalization aims to create a legal and regulated industry that prioritizes consumer safety. It also enables law enforcement to redirect resources towards more pressing matters. Additionally, legalization has the potential to stimulate economic growth, generate tax revenue, and create job opportunities within the cannabis sector. Similarly, the legalization and regulation of casinos in this list of offshore sportsbooks can have parallel effects, providing a controlled environment for gambling activities, enhancing consumer protection, and contributing to economic development through taxation and job creation.”

Public Health Considerations

Legalization provides an opportunity to implement robust public health measures. Regulation allows for quality control, standardized testing, and labeling requirements, ensuring that consumers have access to safe and accurately dosed cannabis products. Furthermore, it facilitates the implementation of educational campaigns promoting responsible use and mitigating potential health risks associated with cannabis consumption.

Contrasting Decriminalization and Legalization

While decriminalization and legalization share a common goal of reforming cannabis policies, notable differences exist between these two approaches.

Scope of Reform

Decriminalization primarily focuses on reducing criminal penalties for minor cannabis offenses, whereas legalization encompasses a broader framework that includes regulation, taxation, and control of the cannabis market.

Criminal Justice and Social Equity

Decriminalization addresses concerns regarding criminal justice disparities and the burden placed on the legal system, particularly for non-violent cannabis offenses. In contrast, legalization seeks to create a regulated market that promotes social equity, offers economic opportunities, and tackles historical injustices through initiatives such as expungement of prior cannabis convictions.

Economic and Market Impact

Decriminalization does not establish a legal market for cannabis, which limits its economic potential. Legalization, on the other hand, unlocks opportunities for entrepreneurship, job creation, and tax revenue generation through the establishment of a regulated cannabis industry.

Conclusion

In conclusion, comprehending the nuanced distinctions between cannabis decriminalization and legalization is essential in evaluating the potential outcomes associated with each approach. While decriminalization aims to address criminal justice issues, legalization offers a broader framework that encompasses market regulation, economic growth, and social concerns.

Related Posts

Posted on by

2023 California Funds $20 Million in Cannabis Grants

California regulatory authorities have allocated approximately $20 million to 16 state universities for the purpose of conducting extensive scientific research on various cannabis-related matters and compounds. These investigations encompass a wide range of areas, such as mental health, the exploration of delta-8 and delta-10 compounds, and what is being touted as the pioneering examination of marijuana legacy genetics.

The selection of recipients was carried out from a pool of 98 proposals, with emphasis placed on robust methodologies, potential influence on policy, the advancement of public knowledge, and the capacity to develop fundamental research. These criteria were detailed in a news release.

A number of universities were fortunate enough to receive multiple awards.

Noteworthy recipients include:

  • UCLA, which secured $9.5 million to delve into intoxication levels associated with synthetic and semi-synthetic cannabinoids, the impacts of smoking concentrates and flower, interactions between cannabis and CBD, as well as medical marijuana usage.
  • The University of California San Diego, which obtained $917,000 for a four-year undertaking dedicated to examining the effects of cannabinoids on cognitive, psychiatric, and neural outcomes among young adults. Additionally, they will conduct a separate study concerning cannabis use and its impact on mental health among adolescents.
  • Cal Poly Humboldt, which was granted $2.7 million to undertake an identification, documentation, and preservation project aimed at capturing the history, value, and diversity inherent in California’s rural legacy cannabis genetics and the corresponding communities.
  • UC Irvine, which received $2 million to conduct research on the acute effects of high THC levels on mood, cognition, and abuse potential. Rasha Salama, the chief deputy director at the state’s Department of Cannabis Control, expressed the department’s aspirations for these studies, stating that they aim to advance the body of scientific research, further our comprehension of cannabis, and contribute to the ongoing development and refinement of the legal framework.

Salama added, “These studies will yield valuable insights into topics of significant interest to California’s consumers, businesses, and policy makers.”

cbd laboratory for swollen feet

Some of our other CBD articles:

Our other article about CBD for neck pain and CBD for foot pain.

Posted on by

New 2023 Regulations For Hemp-derived Cannabinoids Tennessee

New regulations pertaining to the trade of hemp-derived cannabinoids within Tennessee are poised to take effect subsequent to receiving final endorsement from state legislators on Tuesday.

cbd hemp oil tincture
Laarn more about hemp oil 10,000mg

State House Speaker Cameron Sexton dispatched Senate Bill 378 to the office of Republican Governor Bill Lee, as indicated by a legislative database. It is anticipated that Governor Lee will affix his signature, thus enshrining the measure as law. The key provisions of the bill encompass the following:

  1. Hemp-derived cannabinoid products must undergo meticulous laboratory analysis, conform to stipulated labeling requirements, and be packaged in a manner resistant to tampering by children.
  2. Retailers engaged in the sale of hemp-derived cannabinoids are required to obtain a license from the state agriculture department no later than January 1, 2024.
  3. The fee for a license issued to producers is established at $500, while retailers must remit $250. Producers were already subject to a preexisting licensing prerequisite.
  4. Sales of hemp-derived cannabinoid products will be subjected to a novel “privilege tax” of 5%, the utilization of which state law expressly mandates “exclusively for the regulation of products containing a hemp-derived cannabinoid.
  5. Violators found contravening the newly established regulations may face a fine of $1,000 or be charged with a misdemeanor offense.
  6. Prospective purchasers of products incorporating hemp-derived cannabinoids are required to attain a minimum age of 21 years.

The state of Tennessee has aligned itself with a nationwide initiative aimed at exerting control over a predominantly unregulated market.

Certain states that have already legalized the adult use of marijuana have gone so far as to completely prohibit the sale and distribution of hemp-derived cannabinoids, including delta-8 THC.

Conversely, states such as Tennessee, where marijuana remains illegal, have duly recognized the surging demand for such products subsequent to their federal legalization under the 2018 Farm Bill.

CBD Cream for Swollen Feet

Learn more about Hemp & CBD

Posted on by

2023 Virginia Lawmakers Approve Gov. Youngkin’s Amendments to Hemp Regulations

hemp plant for cbd

In a significant development for the hemp industry, lawmakers in Virginia have given their approval to Governor Youngkin’s proposed amendments to hemp regulations. The amendments, aimed at streamlining the state’s hemp program and promoting growth in the industry, received widespread support from both sides of the aisle.

Focus on Hemp Industry Growth

Under Governor Youngkin’s amendments, several key changes will be implemented to enhance the hemp industry’s growth and create a more favorable business environment. One of the major changes is the introduction of a licensing program that will simplify the process for farmers and businesses to cultivate and process hemp.

The new licensing program will ensure that farmers can easily obtain permits to grow hemp, with reduced paperwork and shorter waiting periods. This move is expected to encourage more farmers to enter the industry and contribute to the overall expansion of hemp cultivation in the state.

Promoting Research and Development

Recognizing the immense potential of hemp in various sectors, Governor Youngkin’s amendments also focus on promoting research and development in the field. The updated regulations will establish a dedicated fund to support research initiatives related to hemp cultivation techniques, product development, and the identification of potential market opportunities.

By encouraging research and development, Virginia aims to position itself as a leader in hemp innovation, fostering collaboration between academic institutions, private companies, and farmers. This concerted effort will drive advancements in hemp cultivation methods, leading to improved crop yields and the development of high-value hemp-based products. Parallel to this agricultural innovation, the financial sector is seeing a surge in opportunities like crypto presales, which are attracting investors looking to get early access to the next big digital asset, mirroring the forward-thinking approach in Virginia’s hemp industry.

Top 3 CBD Creams for Tendonitis

Ensuring Compliance and Consumer Safety

Governor Youngkin’s amendments prioritize the establishment of robust quality control measures to ensure compliance and consumer safety. The updated regulations will require hemp producers and processors to adhere to strict testing protocols to guarantee that their products meet the required standards for purity and potency.

Furthermore, the amendments will enhance traceability within the hemp supply chain by implementing a comprehensive tracking system. This will enable authorities to monitor the movement of hemp and hemp-derived products, ensuring that they are sourced and handled in a legal and transparent manner.

Economic Boost and Job Creation

With the approval of these amendments, Virginia is poised to experience a significant economic boost and job creation. The hemp industry has the potential to generate substantial revenue for the state and create numerous employment opportunities across various sectors, including farming, processing, manufacturing, and retail.

By supporting the growth of the hemp industry, Virginia aims to capitalize on this economic potential and become a hub for hemp-related businesses. The amendments will attract investors and entrepreneurs looking to establish hemp farms, processing facilities, and innovative startups, thus contributing to the overall economic development of the state.

In conclusion, the approval of Governor Youngkin’s amendments to the hemp regulations marks a crucial milestone for the hemp industry in Virginia. The changes are set to streamline the licensing process, promote research and development, ensure compliance and consumer safety, and drive economic growth. With these progressive amendments in place, Virginia is positioning itself as a leader in the hemp sector, unlocking its potential for innovation, job creation, and a thriving hemp market.

Latest Posts and News

Posted on by

Exploring the Potential Benefits of Cannabis for Children with Autism

Cannabis is a plant that has gained recognition as a treatment for various health problems, and some doctors in certain states of the US now recommend it to their patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), a condition that affects over 700 million people worldwide. Although not widely known, cannabis has the potential to provide relief from certain ASD symptoms.

Continue reading Exploring the Potential Benefits of Cannabis for Children with Autism
Posted on by

Why Hemp is the Next Big Thing

As we peer into the future, the potential of hemp cannot be underestimated. This versatile plant has been utilized for myriad purposes for centuries, and its popularity continues to surge as we discover novel applications. In this exposé, we will expound on the manifold benefits of hemp and its potential to transform the world as we know it.

hemp plant for cbd
hemp plant for cbd topicals

What is Hemp?

Hemp denotes a cannabis strain that is specifically cultivated for industrial purposes. Unlike marijuana, which is bred for its psychoactive properties, hemp contains negligible levels of THC, thus it does not cause intoxication. Hemp can be transformed into a gamut of commodities, from fabrics and construction materials to comestibles and medications.

The Ecological Benefits of Hemp

Hemp’s most conspicuous advantage is its environmental friendliness. Hemp is a fast-growing crop that requires scant irrigation and no pesticides. It can thrive in diverse climates, making it an eco-friendly and multifarious option for farmers worldwide. Furthermore, hemp has the potential to supplant more pernicious materials like cotton and plastic in sundry industries.

Hemp as a Renewable Energy Source

Hemp also has the potential to serve as a crucial source of renewable energy. The plant can be utilized to generate biofuels, which are an environmentally sound substitute for fossil fuels. Hemp biomass can also be converted to produce electricity and heat, making it a versatile and sustainable option for energy production.

The Medicinal Potential of Hemp

Another sphere where hemp holds considerable promise is healthcare. CBD, a compound present in hemp, has been demonstrated to possess a myriad of therapeutic benefits. It has been used to treat conditions ranging from chronic pain to anxiety and depression, and ongoing research seeks to explore its potential in other areas of healthcare. Some are made into 5000 creams and 10,000 creams while others are made into sublingual tinctures.

The Economic Impact of Hemp

Hemp has the potential to be a significant driver of economic growth. As more industries realize the advantages of hemp, demand for the crop is likely to increase, creating fresh opportunities for farmers and entrepreneurs. Moreover, incorporating hemp into various commodities could translate into cost savings for businesses and consumers alike.

Conclusion

As we have witnessed, hemp has the potential to be a game-changer in diverse fields. From its environmentally friendly features to its potential as a renewable energy source and a powerful medication, hemp has the potential to metamorphose the way we live and work. As we look optimistically towards the future, it is apparent that hemp will play an increasingly pivotal role in shaping our world.

Posted on by

California Failed To Pass Legislation

We are disappointed to report that efforts have failed, for the time being, to pass legislation in California that would explicitly permit the retail sale of hemp-derived CBD as a dietary supplement, cosmetic, and food and beverage additive.

Due to intra-party fights that had nothing to do with legislation, (No surprise) the state Senate leadership refused to allow a vote on the legislative language, despite the Governor’s endorsement and the overwhelming bi-partisan support for hemp farmers and our industry.

However, Governor Newsom’s team agreed to immediately establish a policy of formal enforcement discretion, under which current retailers and manufacturers, operating in good faith compliance with current law, would be allowed to continue to sell and manufacture their hemp CBD products until a new law is enacted.

If you would like to read the Bill click below (Its 66 pages long!) Its in a pdf format

AB2028_CA-1Download

A big thank you to wherezhemp for keeping the industry updated!
wherezhemp .com/article/disappointing-news-for-the-hemp-industry-in-california.html